LLM Compare
Head to head

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5

How Qwen3.8 Omni Flash and Claude Opus 5.5 stack up across benchmarks, pricing, speed, and the workloads that matter.

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Proprietary

Blended pricen/aper 1M tokens
Contextn/atokens
Speedn/atok/s
Benchmarks5results
VS

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic · Proprietary

Blended price$5.78per 1M tokens
Context1Mtokens
Speed15.6tok/s
Benchmarks31results

On reasoning, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash leads by about 13 points in our normalized benchmark average.

The table below breaks down every workload axis where both models have published results. Each score is a normalized 0 to 1 average across the benchmarks tagged with that category. A gap of a few points is noise; a gap of ten or more is a real difference in capability. Where one model has not reported a result, the cell shows n/a and the missing benchmark does not drag its average down.

Benchmark scores by workload

WorkloadQwen3.8 Omni FlashClaude Opus 5.5Edge
Reasoning 87% 74% +13.1 pts
Coding n/a 73% n/a
Agents & tool use 73% 63% +9.9 pts
Math n/a 74% n/a
Vision & multimodal 80% 80% +0 pts
Writing n/a 61% n/a
Knowledge & factuality 92% 77% +15 pts

The headline benchmarks below are the most widely cited individual tests. GPQA Diamond measures graduate-level reasoning in physics, chemistry, and biology. SWE-Bench Verified tests whether a model can fix real GitHub issues. MMMU-Pro covers college-level multimodal understanding across six disciplines. AIME and FrontierMath push competitive and research math. BrowseComp measures web research ability.

Headline benchmarks

BenchmarkQwen3.8 Omni FlashClaude Opus 5.5

Benchmarks tell you what a model can do in a controlled setting. They do not tell you whether it will work on your specific task, with your specific data, at your specific scale. The recommendations below map each common workload to whichever of these two models scores higher on the relevant axis. Use them as a starting point, not a final answer.

Which should you choose?

Hard reasoning

Multi-step analysis, research, and problems that need sustained thought.

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Coding & software

Writing, reviewing, and debugging code across a real codebase.

Claude Opus 5.5

Agents & tool use

Long-running agents that call tools, browse, and act on their own.

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Math & science

Formal math, competitive problems, and quantitative science.

Claude Opus 5.5

Vision & documents

Reading images, screenshots, charts, and dense documents.

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Writing & drafting

Copy, emails, and long-form drafting where tone matters.

Claude Opus 5.5

Scores are normalized from public benchmarks published by llm-stats.com and averaged per workload. Pricing is the blended input/output cost per million tokens at an 8:1 mix. Refreshes daily. How this works.