LLM Compare
Head to head

Gemini 4 Argon vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

How Gemini 4 Argon and MiMo-V2.6-Flash stack up across benchmarks, pricing, speed, and the workloads that matter.

Gemini 4 Argon

Google · Proprietary

Blended pricen/aper 1M tokens
Contextn/atokens
Speedn/atok/s
Benchmarks19results
VS

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi · Open weights

Blended price$0.16per 1M tokens
Context1.05Mtokens
Speed6.1tok/s
Benchmarks16results

On coding, Gemini 4 Argon leads by about 11 points in our normalized benchmark average.

The table below breaks down every workload axis where both models have published results. Each score is a normalized 0 to 1 average across the benchmarks tagged with that category. A gap of a few points is noise; a gap of ten or more is a real difference in capability. Where one model has not reported a result, the cell shows n/a and the missing benchmark does not drag its average down.

Benchmark scores by workload

WorkloadGemini 4 ArgonMiMo-V2.6-FlashEdge
Reasoning 71% 67% +3.9 pts
Coding 65% 54% +10.7 pts
Agents & tool use 56% 55% +1.5 pts
Math 76% n/a n/a
Vision & multimodal 82% 78% +3.8 pts
Long context 88% n/a n/a
Writing n/a 61% n/a
Knowledge & factuality 57% 71% +13.7 pts

The headline benchmarks below are the most widely cited individual tests. GPQA Diamond measures graduate-level reasoning in physics, chemistry, and biology. SWE-Bench Verified tests whether a model can fix real GitHub issues. MMMU-Pro covers college-level multimodal understanding across six disciplines. AIME and FrontierMath push competitive and research math. BrowseComp measures web research ability.

Headline benchmarks

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonMiMo-V2.6-Flash

Benchmarks tell you what a model can do in a controlled setting. They do not tell you whether it will work on your specific task, with your specific data, at your specific scale. The recommendations below map each common workload to whichever of these two models scores higher on the relevant axis. Use them as a starting point, not a final answer.

Which should you choose?

Hard reasoning

Multi-step analysis, research, and problems that need sustained thought.

Gemini 4 Argon

Coding & software

Writing, reviewing, and debugging code across a real codebase.

Gemini 4 Argon

Agents & tool use

Long-running agents that call tools, browse, and act on their own.

Gemini 4 Argon

Math & science

Formal math, competitive problems, and quantitative science.

Gemini 4 Argon

Vision & documents

Reading images, screenshots, charts, and dense documents.

Gemini 4 Argon

Long documents

Whole codebases, books, and transcripts that fill the context window.

Gemini 4 Argon

Writing & drafting

Copy, emails, and long-form drafting where tone matters.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Scores are normalized from public benchmarks published by llm-stats.com and averaged per workload. Pricing is the blended input/output cost per million tokens at an 8:1 mix. Refreshes daily. How this works.